↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006093.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Gagnon, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Pierre Frémont, Pierre Pluye, Johanne Gagnon, Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Marie Desmartis, Lucile Turcot, Karine Gravel

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICT) are defined as digital and analogue technologies that facilitate the capturing, processing, storage and exchange of information via electronic communication. ICTs have the potential to improve information management, access to health services, quality of care, continuity of services, and cost containment. Knowledge is lacking on conditions for successful ICT integration into practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 8 3%
Canada 5 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 287 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 21%
Researcher 61 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Unspecified 27 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 95 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 41%
Computer Science 38 12%
Unspecified 36 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Other 55 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#948,969
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,858
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,287
of 117,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.