↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006093.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Gagnon, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Pierre Frémont, Pierre Pluye, Johanne Gagnon, Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Marie Desmartis, Lucile Turcot, Karine Gravel

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICT) are defined as digital and analogue technologies that facilitate the capturing, processing, storage and exchange of information via electronic communication. ICTs have the potential to improve information management, access to health services, quality of care, continuity of services, and cost containment. Knowledge is lacking on conditions for successful ICT integration into practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 8 2%
Canada 5 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 328 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 22%
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 14%
Other 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 83 23%
Unknown 42 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 11%
Computer Science 39 11%
Social Sciences 28 8%
Psychology 20 6%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 53 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,303,830
of 16,459,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,435
of 11,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,723
of 135,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,459,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.