↓ Skip to main content

Ecological correlates of invasion impact for Burmese pythons in Florida

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative Zoology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

1 Facebook page


11 Dimensions

Readers on

69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Ecological correlates of invasion impact for Burmese pythons in Florida
Published in
Integrative Zoology, January 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00304.x
Pubmed ID

REED, Robert N., WILLSON, John D., RODDA, Gordon H., DORCAS, Michael E., Reed RN, Willson JD, Rodda GH, Dorcas ME


An invasive population of Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) is established across several thousand square kilometers of southern Florida and appears to have caused precipitous population declines among several species of native mammals. Why has this giant snake had such great success as an invasive species when many established reptiles have failed to spread? We scored the Burmese python for each of 15 literature-based attributes relative to predefined comparison groups from a diverse range of taxa and provide a review of the natural history and ecology of Burmese pythons relevant to each attribute. We focused on attributes linked to spread and magnitude of impacts rather than establishment success. Our results suggest that attributes related to body size and generalism appeared to be particularly applicable to the Burmese python's success in Florida. The attributes with the highest scores were: high reproductive potential, low vulnerability to predation, large adult body size, large offspring size and high dietary breadth. However, attributes of ectotherms in general and pythons in particular (including predatory mode, energetic efficiency and social interactions) might have also contributed to invasion success. Although establishment risk assessments are an important initial step in prevention of new establishments, evaluating species in terms of their potential for spreading widely and negatively impacting ecosystems might become part of the means by which resource managers prioritize control efforts in environments with large numbers of introduced species.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 9%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 32%
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 64%
Environmental Science 15 22%
Unspecified 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2012.
All research outputs
of 3,627,006 outputs
Outputs from Integrative Zoology
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 75,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative Zoology
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,627,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them