@BNOFeed Gain of function coupled with the experimental shot reimagined seasonal cold and flu season! https://t.co/PuZDxnraME
Studies show that both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination can induce antibodies capable of antibody-mediated enhancement of infection (ADE) - may worsen the disease. https://t.co/rK88kZw8Cr https://t.co/s20N1qQSYr
Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved as the data suggested they may worsen the disease via antibody-dependent enhancement, ADE. This risk was sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols & consent forms for COVID-19 vaccine tri
RT @USADontComply: @Michael13584052 THE RISK OF ADE IN COVID‐19 VACCINES IS NON‐THEORETICAL AND COMPELLING They knew https://t.co/dPPA0m…
@Michael13584052 THE RISK OF ADE IN COVID‐19 VACCINES IS NON‐THEORETICAL AND COMPELLING They knew https://t.co/dPPA0mkUt8
@MichaelPelusoMD @WesElyMD Long Covid is a cover term for vaccine injury and or ADE https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@CDC_Cancer @womenshealth If the CDC recommends it do the opposite. No regulation on carcinogens in products from skin care to the foods we eat. Why hasn’t this organization been deemed a terrorist organization for promoting a bioweapon. https://t.co/cAV
@UngaTheGreat Reputable, and peer reviewed research has shown that mRNA "vaccines" are not effective and have substantial risk of severe harm. The COVID-19 mRNA shots have been proven to make you more likely to get the virus rather than prevent it. https:/
@Lormif1 @BenSwann_ Why make things worse though? "COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated." https://t.co/7z8TZBXkWw
@PhoneTrips @JanciToxDoc @jmlmdub @TheChiefNerd Still waiting for you to provide evidence to back your false claim ..... 🤡🤡🤡 https://t.co/0IezJeFoC5 https://t.co/ZwLxdmnHQo
@PhoneTrips @jmlmdub @TheChiefNerd @PhoneTrips = 🤡🤡🤡 "The experiments were done earlier using volunteers who were fully informed". https://t.co/0IezJeFoC5 https://t.co/eq71xJnor9
@NCLAlegal When doctors get $$$ from pharma companies &/or gov for injecting experimental meds into a population & denying them fully informed consent, we got a Mengele sort of problem. Cures are a bad business model. Repeat customers are more s
@MichaelDaignau3 @ENirenberg @lapublichealth ADE for the vaccinated unfortunately.. A worthwhile MD would have known about this risk beforehand https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@MichaeljSpence8 @DecodingFoxNews https://t.co/3LexQjkoNI You’re welcome.
@djlange @TRyanGregory ADE is only a factor for the vaccinated https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@SilverHollowsz @KanekoaTheGreat @MdBreathe @GregAbbott_TX Before trials. "COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated." https://t.co/7z8TZBXkWw
@megan_redshaw Well said. 💯💯💯 Here's an oldie, but a goody. (note the date of publication). ⬇️ https://t.co/0IezJeFoC5 https://t.co/O9RTHjDgt6
@VCS_VKS @STM_Uutiset By #rejecting the use of the #InformedConsent #form, there is a #gross #violation of #medicalethics, #patientrights, follow-up, and a violation of the #NurembergCode, a #WarCrime. - Informed consent, PMCID: PMC7645850 | 2020 Oct 28
@normanpie @JimFergusonUK https://t.co/wIQR26jMaH Conclusion... risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently...disclosed to...subjects...in vaccine trials... and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard
@MelindaHamerMD You should take a look at this brilliant paper by Dr Timothy Cardozo and Dr Ronald Veazey, written back in Oct 2020 (prior to the rollout). I wish more people had read it then. https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@Suk_A_Dic @sailboatbob12 @timjp0424 @Censored4sure @DC_Draino I see, you COULDN'T do any research. 🤣🤦♀️ You don't understand this info from FDA, NIH or the Pfizer product insert. 😂😂 Many died, esp in sports, & still are. Much more disabled & 📈. 😒
@Carolyn66473210 @TraLC @EmeraldRobinson No. & frankly, i'm actually proud of this fact at this point being as how 90% of them are pharma whores. That said, do you believe you need to be an MD, have a PHD, or do a residency to comprehend this study? Ho
@IvyB85264544 @JSterling007 @CShoemakerMD @Answers4Sean Same. Nothing about this entire damned thing seemed legit from the get go. In about March, I found this online & it took me down a 2 year rabbit hole. That was when I absolutely I KNEW we were bei
@SSSSLAYERRRR @ericsalter @CKellyUAP They absolutely lied. Everyone did. That said, there was indeed published literature noting potential risks that should've been disclosed, yet they chose to ignore disclosing this altogether. (Note the date of publicati
@WebbArdsod @YardleyShooting https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 Conclusion... risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently...disclosed to...subjects...in vaccine trials... and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics stand
RT @fubarspam: @Jake45922 @drcole12 Good question. Here's the closest I've found. https://t.co/0IezJeFoC5 https://t.co/wjDjsO8epk
@Jake45922 @drcole12 Good question. Here's the closest I've found. https://t.co/0IezJeFoC5 https://t.co/wjDjsO8epk
@handmadekathy @MzJuicyBea @doritmi @AllenDMartin @johntriplesix70 @nlawrence333 @mamabearnh @YouTube @mehdirhasan "Why" Why not. https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently...disclosed to...subjects...in vaccine trials.
@BumsteadSteve @GVDBossche They knew even before that, it seems. And this study tried to warn that informed consent was insufficient without revealing ADE risk. 👇 https://t.co/Vnar4pGm1s
@ryanbeed @david_broadley @mpc_xetts @DrKellyVictory Gain-of-Function Fauci has spoken some truth on occasion. Fauci on vaxes backfiring 1 https://t.co/gyzSynX9fl 2 https://t.co/WdOyWDO5LM https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 risk of ADE...should be prominently...dis
@ryanbeed @david_broadley @mpc_xetts @DrKellyVictory https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 Conclusion... risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently...disclosed to...subjects...in vaccine trials... and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet
RT @JaneStanley64: @GodsRiddles Mr Ward have you seen this??? https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw
RT @JaneStanley64: @GodsRiddles Mr Ward have you seen this??? https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw
RT @JaneStanley64: @GodsRiddles Mr Ward have you seen this??? https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw
RT @JaneStanley64: @GodsRiddles Mr Ward have you seen this??? https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw
RT @JaneStanley64: @GodsRiddles Mr Ward have you seen this??? https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw
@GodsRiddles Mr Ward have you seen this??? https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw
@BuckSexton He was right about this https://t.co/F5aBNvx9Nh THE RISK OF ADE IN COVID‐19 VACCINES IS NON‐THEORETICAL AND COMPELLING https://t.co/dPPA0mkUt8
@Nowheretorun723 @JenJulesJabba @weldeiry @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Common sense huh? Apparently, your common sense never kicked in until.......? (Note the date of publication). Here's a 2 minute read even you can comprehend. 🤡 Thousands more where this
RT @PamelaTaylor000: What is occurring is the graphene acts like a piece of glass or sword in your blood stream and it damages red and whit…
@HopeRising19 It was clearly planned, or at least the warnings were willfully and negligently ignored. See paper from Oct 2020 warning of ADE and taking issue with mRNA vaccine trial members NOT being informed ADE is a REAL nontheoretical risk as it has al
What is occurring is the graphene acts like a piece of glass or sword in your blood stream and it damages red and white blood cells. Low white blood cell numbers lower your immune system functioning making opportunists diseases like cancers to thrive. h
@EliStrawmaning @LevineJonathan He has evidence of what he says. Some people refuse to believe the evidence. Sorry if you can't be helped. Enjoy the bugs and 15 minutes cities. 👇 https://t.co/bkurhEs1pS https://t.co/g1bU0MG4rR
@DarrellMello @curiousdatacat It's ADE Doc https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@curiousdatacat This is the ADE phase for all the Vaccinated. So if you got a booster it's not over for you. This was warned before the rollout https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@joshg99 @isuckatwife @ABridgen @RetsefL Check out this paper published in Oct 2020 before rollout. https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
RT @ToBornin: @MattMcInnis6 @ImmunizedotCa @CanPaedSociety You know it !! Not even the original trial participants were given proper infor…
RT @ToBornin: @MattMcInnis6 @ImmunizedotCa @CanPaedSociety You know it !! Not even the original trial participants were given proper infor…
@MattMcInnis6 @ImmunizedotCa @CanPaedSociety You know it !! Not even the original trial participants were given proper informed consent. How could anyone else ? https://t.co/pPItpgFkiN https://t.co/1T86aS3TSf
RT @JaneStanley64: @AuthorAllieR @CartlandDavid Show this to your doctor. This is not long COVID, it is Antibody Dependent Enhancement!!!!…
@AuthorAllieR @CartlandDavid Show this to your doctor. This is not long COVID, it is Antibody Dependent Enhancement!!!! https://t.co/cAVREnDLWw CV 19 bioweapon trials will be complete in 2024.
RT @Cherie85173868: @MeetJess @CDCDirector You r right w the gaslighting from day 1…but the fact that some people r still being seriously a…
RT @HouseOf5thSun: @MittemeijerOote Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling.... https://t.co/9EJbL8Mc85 http…
RT @Cherie85173868: @MeetJess @CDCDirector You r right w the gaslighting from day 1…but the fact that some people r still being seriously a…
@MeetJess @CDCDirector You r right w the gaslighting from day 1…but the fact that some people r still being seriously affected by the mutated viruses is due to reduction in immune system function caused by multiple jabs!They knew this from the get go-ADE!
RT @Quinlan5Mick: How many were told the vaccine could make them worse
RT @Quinlan5Mick: How many were told the vaccine could make them worse https://t.co/vj98l1aJ0P
RT @Quinlan5Mick: How many were told the vaccine could make them worse
How many were told the vaccine could make them worse
RT @HouseOf5thSun: @MittemeijerOote Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling.... https://t.co/9EJbL8Mc85 http…
@MittemeijerOote Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling.... https://t.co/9EJbL8Mc85 https://t.co/YUTCEBqfS1
@CKellyUAP Another concerns back in : 2021. If you take this 14 days into account. Their deaths or illnesses might have been cause due to the vax making people more vulnerable to other diseases ! https://t.co/tknU8bQ7nA https://t.co/AdIlsV93zv
@DrNoMask Here's an oldie, but a goody. I wonder what that fucking prick would say about this given the date of publication. So help me god, i'd love to meet him in a dark alley someday (to show him & discuss this publication, of course). 😶 https://t.c
@tracybeanz Take a look at this. Published in Oct 2020 and ignored https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@bfhermann @DrStevenKlayman So why'd you get tricked so badly? Was it mass formation psychosis? Or were you paid to give out mRNA shots? Seriously what's your excuse for being so naive on topic? Basis 💩 Did you even know that every coronavirus attempt in
@jsm2334 @Toby_Zimmerman @VPrasadMDMPH So Prof Morris what made them think these Coronavirus vaccines would be any different than every other in history ever attempted.. ALL of which resulted in ADE 2 to 3 yrs post vax when a wild type virus was encountere
@bronzeagent @MythinformedMKE Well u would need a brain to interpret charts/data so no surprise there 🤣 u also not on a 1st grade ENG level? COVID19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise recipients to more severe disease than
@brena_michael @chrismartenson Also Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling risk...... https://t.co/9EJbL8Mc85
@AnnetteAll23832 @andy_murray @MartinJH17 @GillianMcKeith Published Dec. 4, 2020. (Original publication was in October of 2019). https://t.co/Jnogsgd7qL
@42believer @HiddenPinky @stkirsch @AskDrDrew Forget about debate, Just explain some simple questions. Like why did we think the onset of ADE would be any different this time around when every attempt in history to make a coronavirus vaccine failed no matt
@forevaeva79 @empoweredca not only were the government pushing these experimental in trial vaccines but evidence was out there that they could actually cause other issues.
@L_A_Wood @dockaurG This 'non-theoretical risk' was known prior to EUA. From 2020 "Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease" https://t.co/3I119xGPGv
RT @David32856757: @Megalodon_2nd @mpc_xetts @Joeblow19995676 @DrAseemMalhotra https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 Conclusion... risk of ADE should hav…
RT @David32856757: @Megalodon_2nd @mpc_xetts @Joeblow19995676 @DrAseemMalhotra https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 Conclusion... risk of ADE should hav…
@Megalodon_2nd @mpc_xetts @Joeblow19995676 @DrAseemMalhotra https://t.co/wIQR26jel9 Conclusion... risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently...disclosed to...subjects...in vaccine trials... and future patients after vaccine approval, in order t
@sbeeftink1 @Tabby_Edwards @angelanashtn Moderna admitted to getting a computer read out of CV19 (in silico) virus & made the vaxx in 2 days. https://t.co/qUDeeutPgx Dr Malone who holds a patent on mRNA said mRNA is not ready for human or animal use
@PSCommissioner @NHS_SPS @UKMedicinesInfo @UKCPAPIN @davidwebb_1 @PJOnline_News @keithridge1 Paper from 2021 I hope this was included as a specific risk in the informed consent process? It was highlighted as a possibility by MHRA and WHO https://t.co/trsOi
RT @SampsonRamm: @Jennife40357371 @ADevotedYogi @TXAG @fordnation @celliottability @JustinTrudeau @COVIDSciOntario You see this?? Even th…
RT @ToBornin: @Jikkyleaks @MFTnhs @MENnewsdesk Add to that .:: The trial participants at the beginning of it all were not given all the n…
RT @ToBornin: @Jikkyleaks @MFTnhs @MENnewsdesk Add to that .:: The trial participants at the beginning of it all were not given all the n…
RT @ToBornin: @Jikkyleaks @MFTnhs @MENnewsdesk Add to that .:: The trial participants at the beginning of it all were not given all the n…
RT @ToBornin: @Jikkyleaks @MFTnhs @MENnewsdesk Add to that .:: The trial participants at the beginning of it all were not given all the n…
RT @ToBornin: @Jikkyleaks @MFTnhs @MENnewsdesk Add to that .:: The trial participants at the beginning of it all were not given all the n…
@Jikkyleaks @MFTnhs @MENnewsdesk Add to that .:: The trial participants at the beginning of it all were not given all the necessary information it seems…. https://t.co/pPItpgFkiN https://t.co/grX66TmYQn
@RodMakeKidsBald @AndyEly9 @peregrinatious @stkirsch This was all known before the rollout...amazing how clueless Big Pharma cultists are... "COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe dise
@IanCopeland5 Exactly Ian. Just look at the Covid vaccine. The settled established science since 1990 in 1000s of trials and peer-reviewed studies was that unlike the flu virus, a coronavirus could not be helped by a vaccine, due to near certainty of AD E.
@sasha_latypova @Harry71A @GroupSenseCyber @BrycexWJ Then it doesn’t seem they fulfill d informed consent with the trial participants https://t.co/pPItpgFkiN
@CathrynTownsend @han_francis Also can someone explain to me what makes these mRNA Vaccines so different than all other coronavirus vaccines in history that ended in ADE. @PeterHotez warned congress about these at 1st but at some point changed his mind but
@TuckerCarlson Why do people willing submit to becoming lab rats for big pharma? #ExitTheWHO #NoMedicalMandates Some Science got it right - but this side was censored! Informed Consent: 👇 https://t.co/bkurhEs1pS
@Charles07788205 @Dawnms55Marie @LeadingReport Now here is where you need to look at the science. Let me start here before I discuss the mechanism of mrna SP. Do you know what happened in every coronavirus (pre-covid19) vaccine trial (animals or human) E
@EpiEllie False. Informed Consent was never given. This was published in Oct 2020 before the rollout https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@MikeStuchbery_ Informed consent was not given. This was a published warning from Oct 2020. Have a look https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@HenningTveit @stkirsch How about this https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
@SandyBragelman @stkirsch Also this paper published in Oct 2020 https://t.co/LGIkUC3ICq
RT @CrewElon: @StealthMedical1 Has anyone seen this paper from Oct 2020 before the rollout? It says vaccine trialees should be warned about…
@StealthMedical1 Has anyone seen this paper from Oct 2020 before the rollout? It says vaccine trialees should be warned about ADE as part of informed consent. It goes on the say that ADE has occurred in every historical attempt. Even Hotez warned about it.