You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health , November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Unwin, Ali Ahsan Khalid, Jen Unwin, Dominic Crocombe, Christine Delon, Kathy Martyn, Rajna Golubic, Sumantra Ray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,349 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 522 | 22% |
| United States | 271 | 12% |
| Canada | 70 | 3% |
| Australia | 66 | 3% |
| South Africa | 43 | 2% |
| India | 36 | 2% |
| Ireland | 24 | 1% |
| Mexico | 20 | <1% |
| Brazil | 16 | <1% |
| Other | 213 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1068 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1810 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 364 | 15% |
| Scientists | 114 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 36 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1712. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,286
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
#3
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313
of 443,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.