↓ Skip to main content

Scarlet fever and nineteenth‐century mortality trends: a reply to Romola Davenport

Overview of attention for article published in Economic History Review, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scarlet fever and nineteenth‐century mortality trends: a reply to Romola Davenport
Published in
Economic History Review, November 2020
DOI 10.1111/ehr.13042
Authors

Simon Szreter, Graham Mooney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,174,280
of 16,388,684 outputs
Outputs from Economic History Review
#212
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,842
of 350,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic History Review
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,388,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.