| Title |
COVID-19 pandemic impacts on global inland fisheries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2014016117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gretchen L. Stokes, Abigail J. Lynch, Benjamin S. Lowe, Simon Funge-Smith, John Valbo‐Jørgensen, Samuel J. Smidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,352,930
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18,977
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,673
of 426,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#469
of 1,049 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,049 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.