| Title |
Food for thought: The underutilized potential of tropical tree‐sourced foods for 21st century sustainable food systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PEOPLE AND NATURE, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pan3.10159 |
| Authors |
Merel Jansen, Manuel R. Guariguata, Jessica E. Raneri, Amy Ickowitz, Fidel Chiriboga‐Arroyo, Julia Quaedvlieg, Chris J. Kettle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Italy | 4 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 4 | 6% |
| Kenya | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 3% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 81% |
| Scientists | 8 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#193,241
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from PEOPLE AND NATURE
#20
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,603
of 441,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PEOPLE AND NATURE
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.