↓ Skip to main content

Analysing vote-choice in a multinational state: national identity and territorial differentiation in the 2016 Brexit vote

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Studies, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,656)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
105 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysing vote-choice in a multinational state: national identity and territorial differentiation in the 2016 Brexit vote
Published in
Regional Studies, November 2020
DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1813883
Authors

Ailsa Henderson, Ed Gareth Poole, Richard Wyn Jones, Daniel Wincott, Jac Larner, Charlie Jeffery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 36%
Arts and Humanities 3 14%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#469,268
of 22,172,124 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
#20
of 1,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,399
of 401,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,172,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.