You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is ‘viability’ viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Law and the Biosciences, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jlb/lsaa059 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Chloe Romanis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| United States | 9 | 21% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Andorra | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 74% |
| Scientists | 10 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 631. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#35,773
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#4
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,334
of 438,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.