↓ Skip to main content

Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 3,321)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
87 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
158 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, November 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Savulescu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 17%
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 26 9%
Other 16 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 4%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 114 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 18%
Social Sciences 24 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Unspecified 10 3%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 117 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 835. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,809
of 21,429,365 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#9
of 3,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#869
of 398,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,429,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.