You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chemotherapy or allogeneic transplantation in high-risk Philadelphia chromosome–negative adult lymphoblastic leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood.2020007311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josep-Maria Ribera, Mireia Morgades, Juana Ciudad, Pau Montesinos, Jordi Esteve, Eulàlia Genescà, Pere Barba, Jordi Ribera, Irene García-Cadenas, María José Moreno, Daniel Martínez-Carballeira, Anna Torrent, Pilar Martínez-Sánchez, Silvia Monsalvo, Cristina Gil, Mar Tormo, María Teresa Artola, Marta Cervera, José González-Campos, Carlos Rodríguez, Arancha Bermúdez, Andrés Novo, Beatriz Soria, Rosa Coll, María-Luz Amigo, Aurelio López-Martínez, Rosa Fernández-Martín, Josefina Serrano, Santiago Mercadal, Antònia Cladera, Alberto Giménez-Conca, María-Jesús Peñarrubia, Eugènia Abella, Ferran Vall-llovera, Jesús-María Hernández-Rivas, Antoni Garcia-Guiñon, Juan-Miguel Bergua, Beatriz de Rueda, María-José Sánchez-Sánchez, Alfons Serrano, María Calbacho, Natalia Alonso, Jose-Ángel Méndez-Sánchez, Raimundo García-Boyero, Matxalen Olivares, Susana Barrena, Lurdes Zamora, Isabel Granada, Ludovic Lhermitte, Evarist Feliu, Alberto Orfao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 26% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,893,233
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,803
of 33,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,534
of 454,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#37
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.