↓ Skip to main content

Chemotherapy or allogeneic transplantation in high-risk Philadelphia chromosome–negative adult lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemotherapy or allogeneic transplantation in high-risk Philadelphia chromosome–negative adult lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Blood, April 2021
DOI 10.1182/blood.2020007311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep-Maria Ribera, Mireia Morgades, Juana Ciudad, Pau Montesinos, Jordi Esteve, Eulàlia Genescà, Pere Barba, Jordi Ribera, Irene García-Cadenas, María José Moreno, Daniel Martínez-Carballeira, Anna Torrent, Pilar Martínez-Sánchez, Silvia Monsalvo, Cristina Gil, Mar Tormo, María Teresa Artola, Marta Cervera, José González-Campos, Carlos Rodríguez, Arancha Bermúdez, Andrés Novo, Beatriz Soria, Rosa Coll, María-Luz Amigo, Aurelio López-Martínez, Rosa Fernández-Martín, Josefina Serrano, Santiago Mercadal, Antònia Cladera, Alberto Giménez-Conca, María-Jesús Peñarrubia, Eugènia Abella, Ferran Vall-llovera, Jesús-María Hernández-Rivas, Antoni Garcia-Guiñon, Juan-Miguel Bergua, Beatriz de Rueda, María-José Sánchez-Sánchez, Alfons Serrano, María Calbacho, Natalia Alonso, Jose-Ángel Méndez-Sánchez, Raimundo García-Boyero, Matxalen Olivares, Susana Barrena, Lurdes Zamora, Isabel Granada, Ludovic Lhermitte, Evarist Feliu, Alberto Orfao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Other 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,811,913
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#2,022
of 28,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,106
of 389,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#25
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.