↓ Skip to main content

Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009669.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantin Uhlig, Ljupcho Efremov, Jörn Tongers, Stefan Frantz, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Daniel Sedding, Julia Schumann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#832,556
of 17,483,393 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,161
of 11,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,452
of 385,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,483,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.