↓ Skip to main content

Fraternal twins with Phelan-McDermid syndrome not involving the SHANK3 gene: case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fraternal twins with Phelan-McDermid syndrome not involving the SHANK3 gene: case report and literature review
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12920-020-00802-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan Li, Ke-wang Xi, Ting Liu, Ying Zhang, Meng Zhang, Li-dong Zeng, Juan Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,456,421
of 19,296,398 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#729
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,740
of 390,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#63
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,296,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.