You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Urology Focus , November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikita R. Bhatt, Stefan W. Czarniecki, Hendrick Borgmann, Inge M. van Oort, Francesco Esperto, Benjamin Pradere, Mark van Gurp, Jarka Bloemberg, J. Darraugh, Morgan Rouprêt, Stacy Loeb, James N’Dow, Maria J. Ribal, Gianluca Giannarini, on behalf of the EAU Guidelines Office Dissemination Committee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 7% |
| Belgium | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 48% |
| Scientists | 12 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,337,749
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from European Urology Focus
#81
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,113
of 440,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology Focus
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.