↓ Skip to main content

シンポジウム「森を創るために人を育む―野生動物管理の担い手像―」報告

Overview of attention for article published in Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
シンポジウム「森を創るために人を育む―野生動物管理の担い手像―」報告
Published in
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2016
DOI 10.11238/mammalianscience.56.61
Authors

松浦 友紀子, 伊吾田 宏正, 宇野 裕之, 赤坂 猛, 鈴木 正嗣, 東谷 宗光, ヒーリー ノーマン

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#217
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,068
of 367,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.