↓ Skip to main content

Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
Published in
PeerJ, November 2020
DOI 10.7717/peerj.10305
Authors

Sarah L. Giles, Pat Harris, Sean A. Rands, Christine J. Nicol

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 44%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,154,950
of 16,713,463 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#3,352
of 9,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,450
of 381,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#60
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,713,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.