↓ Skip to main content

Carbon Dioxide and Methane Flux in a Dynamic Arctic Tundra Landscape: Decadal‐Scale Impacts of Ice Wedge Degradation and Stabilization

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon Dioxide and Methane Flux in a Dynamic Arctic Tundra Landscape: Decadal‐Scale Impacts of Ice Wedge Degradation and Stabilization
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020gl089894
Authors

K. P. Wickland, M. T. Jorgenson, J. C. Koch, M. Kanevskiy, R. G. Striegl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,746,295
of 19,812,393 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#3,559
of 18,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,855
of 391,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#103
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,812,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.