↓ Skip to main content

Carbon Dioxide and Methane Flux in a Dynamic Arctic Tundra Landscape: Decadal‐Scale Impacts of Ice Wedge Degradation and Stabilization

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon Dioxide and Methane Flux in a Dynamic Arctic Tundra Landscape: Decadal‐Scale Impacts of Ice Wedge Degradation and Stabilization
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020gl089894
Authors

K. P. Wickland, M. T. Jorgenson, J. C. Koch, M. Kanevskiy, R. G. Striegl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,577,055
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#4,708
of 21,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,613
of 526,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#91
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.