| Title |
Troponina Cardíaca como Preditor de Injúria Miocárdica e Mortalidade por COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.36660/abc.20200862 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jorge Henrique Paiter Nascimento, Bruno Ferraz de Oliveira Gomes, Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,879,607
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#78
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,682
of 415,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.