↓ Skip to main content

Closed environments facilitate secondary transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 17,304)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
239 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
6271 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Closed environments facilitate secondary transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.02.28.20029272
Authors

Nishiura, Hiroshi, Oshitani, Hitoshi, Kobayashi, Tetsuro, Saito, Tomoya, Sunagawa, Tomimasa, Matsui, Tamano, Wakita, Takaji, Suzuki, Motoi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,271 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 347 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Student > Master 42 12%
Other 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Researcher 24 7%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 116 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 16%
Engineering 27 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Computer Science 13 4%
Other 83 24%
Unknown 135 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6032. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#250
of 17,138,809 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#10
of 17,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 383,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#3
of 2,107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,138,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.