| Title |
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abe5901 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bas B. Oude Munnink, Reina S. Sikkema, David F. Nieuwenhuijse, Robert Jan Molenaar, Emmanuelle Munger, Richard Molenkamp, Arco van der Spek, Paulien Tolsma, Ariene Rietveld, Miranda Brouwer, Noortje Bouwmeester-Vincken, Frank Harders, Renate Hakze-van der Honing, Marjolein C. A. Wegdam-Blans, Ruth J. Bouwstra, Corine GeurtsvanKessel, Annemiek A. van der Eijk, Francisca C. Velkers, Lidwien A. M. Smit, Arjan Stegeman, Wim H. M. van der Poel, Marion P. G. Koopmans |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,050 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 555 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 235 | 8% |
| Spain | 113 | 4% |
| Canada | 73 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 54 | 2% |
| Denmark | 45 | 1% |
| France | 43 | 1% |
| Japan | 39 | 1% |
| Germany | 29 | <1% |
| Other | 330 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1534 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2587 | 85% |
| Scientists | 293 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 104 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 65 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 714 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 714 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 103 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 131 | 18% |
| Unknown | 238 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 87 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 62 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 50 | 7% |
| Other | 112 | 16% |
| Unknown | 265 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3963. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,209
of 24,496,759 outputs
Outputs from Science
#69
of 79,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75
of 512,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#7
of 874 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,496,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 874 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.