| Title |
Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2923-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Serina Chang, Emma Pierson, Pang Wei Koh, Jaline Gerardin, Beth Redbird, David Grusky, Jure Leskovec |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,635 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1210 | 10% |
| Spain | 1014 | 9% |
| Chile | 308 | 3% |
| France | 289 | 2% |
| Canada | 281 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 246 | 2% |
| Brazil | 224 | 2% |
| Italy | 216 | 2% |
| Germany | 187 | 2% |
| Other | 1734 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5926 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9932 | 85% |
| Scientists | 1167 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 345 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 182 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 196 | 16% |
| Researcher | 179 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 125 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 5% |
| Other | 61 | 5% |
| Other | 222 | 18% |
| Unknown | 374 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 101 | 8% |
| Engineering | 81 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 72 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 5% |
| Other | 351 | 29% |
| Unknown | 454 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#182
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11
of 98,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15
of 436,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 901 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 901 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.