Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography https://t.co/XrBhWPixPq
Great article on gender, gate keeping and quantitative human geography. This year, we investigated #gender #mainstreaming in the @SweMFA - read the article here: https://t.co/W3TFifA2nq
Another swing and a miss from @theAAG! Gender isn't a binary and this isn't hard to understand. (Also, nothing quite like seeing academics using the same f'ed up methods as The Ripped Bodice romance thing did.)
the authors deciding for themselves the genders of the members of the editorial teams, rather than using self-reported gender, introduces measurement error & bias, the kind that has specifically kept the problems us trans people deal with out of the pu
Love the shout out from @theAAG for this paper—on the geography & gender of editorial teams in quant human geography journals—which was a collaborative effort, especially with @VikkiHouldenPhD and @CaitHRobin, but also @darribas @DrDelmelle @udemsar @M
Women are underrepresented on editorial teams of quantitative geography journals. This article from @rsfrankl et al argues that emphasizing inclusive gatekeeping can increase gender diversity in geography and elsewhere https://t.co/TCt5rxZil4 https://t.co/
RT @rsfrankl: Paper here in case you happened to miss my full-throttle twitter thread when it came out 😀 "Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping,…
Paper here in case you happened to miss my full-throttle twitter thread when it came out 😀 "Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography" https://t.co/bVf5IrTWaT
"the editorial teams of flagship quantitative geography journals... women are underrepresented with shares ranging from 23.1 to 43.5%—numbers comparable to many other geography journals." Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography h