The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011405 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony J Avery, Christina Sheehan, Brian Bell, Sarah Armstrong, Darren M Ashcroft, Matthew J Boyd, Antony Chuter, Alison Cooper, Ailsa Donnelly, Adrian Edwards, Huw Prosser Evans, Stuart Hellard, Joanne Lymn, Rajnikant Mehta, Sarah Rodgers, Aziz Sheikh, Pam Smith, Huw Williams, Stephen M Campbell, Andrew Carson-Stevens |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 53 | 40% |
United States | 10 | 8% |
Spain | 7 | 5% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Comoros | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 45 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 75 | 57% |
Scientists | 33 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 23% |
Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 18% |
Psychology | 7 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#398,534
of 26,746,546 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#122
of 2,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,550
of 440,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,746,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.