↓ Skip to main content

Dicere Non Nocere: Public Disclosure of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals on Social Media

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dicere Non Nocere: Public Disclosure of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals on Social Media
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.03.05.20031526
Authors

Katz, Matthew S., Ahmed, Wasim, Gutheil, Thomas G., Jagsi, Reshma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,503,930
of 16,304,890 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#3,436
of 13,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,061
of 296,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#383
of 1,183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,304,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.