↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008880.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW, Rubinstein, Sidney M, Terwee, Caroline B, Assendelft, Willem JJ, de Boer, Michiel R, van Tulder, Maurits W, Sidney M Rubinstein, Caroline B Terwee, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practised intervention. This report is an update of the earlier Cochrane review, first published in January 2004 with the last search for studies up to January 2000.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Professor 2 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 47 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 47 52%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#39,407
of 11,496,517 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 9,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255
of 113,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,496,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.