↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008880.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Caroline B Terwee, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practised intervention. This report is an update of the earlier Cochrane review, first published in January 2004 with the last search for studies up to January 2000.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 315 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 24%
Student > Bachelor 66 20%
Researcher 30 9%
Other 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Other 77 23%
Unknown 25 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 18%
Psychology 21 6%
Sports and Recreations 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 40 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 261. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#49,689
of 13,980,606 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 10,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312
of 128,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,980,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.