↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008880.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Caroline B Terwee, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practised intervention. This report is an update of the earlier Cochrane review, first published in January 2004 with the last search for studies up to January 2000.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 200%
Other 1 100%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 100%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 254. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#42,599
of 12,519,471 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 8,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281
of 125,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,519,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.