↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
575 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008880.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Caroline B Terwee, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practised intervention. This report is an update of the earlier Cochrane review, first published in January 2004 with the last search for studies up to January 2000.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 199 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 575 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 565 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 111 19%
Student > Bachelor 110 19%
Researcher 42 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 7%
Student > Postgraduate 35 6%
Other 106 18%
Unknown 133 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 192 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 105 18%
Psychology 27 5%
Sports and Recreations 26 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 51 9%
Unknown 160 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 273. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#132,343
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#238
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#582
of 187,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.