↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality
Published in
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41239-020-00228-9
Authors

Tycho T. de Back, Angelica M. Tinga, Phong Nguyen, Max M. Louwerse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 12 15%
Lecturer 6 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 16%
Computer Science 11 14%
Arts and Humanities 7 9%
Psychology 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 29 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,476,144
of 20,151,985 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#119
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,548
of 328,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#23
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,151,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.