↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality
Published in
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41239-020-00228-9
Authors

Tycho T. de Back, Angelica M. Tinga, Phong Nguyen, Max M. Louwerse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Master 20 9%
Lecturer 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Researcher 6 3%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 105 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 9%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Arts and Humanities 9 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 115 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,937,786
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#128
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,426
of 413,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.