↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009351.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudy Klomp, Mireille van Poppel, Leanne Jones, Janine Lazet, Marcello Di Nisio, Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

Many women would like to have a choice in pain relief during labour and also would like to avoid invasive methods of pain management in labour. Inhaled analgesia during labour involves the self-administered inhalation of sub-anaesthetic concentrations of agents while the mother remains awake and her protective laryngeal reflexes remain intact. Most of the agents are easy to administer, can be started in less than a minute and become effective within a minute.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Unspecified 17 9%
Other 53 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 54%
Unspecified 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Psychology 11 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 17 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#277,013
of 12,691,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#784
of 10,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,154
of 126,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,691,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.