↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004640.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather O Dickinson, Donald Nicolson, Fiona Campbell, Julia V Cook, Fiona R Beyer, Gary A Ford, James Mason

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence on the effects of magnesium on blood pressure is inconsistent. Metabolic and experimental studies suggest that magnesium may have a role in the regulation of blood pressure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 27%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 17 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#276,661
of 16,258,335 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#608
of 11,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,632
of 134,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,258,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.