↓ Skip to main content

Auditing ethnic preference in Hong Kong’s financial job market: The mediation of white privilege and Hong Kong localism

Overview of attention for article published in International Sociology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 441)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
Title
Auditing ethnic preference in Hong Kong’s financial job market: The mediation of white privilege and Hong Kong localism
Published in
International Sociology, November 2020
DOI 10.1177/0268580920957801
Authors

Yao-Tai Li, John Chung-En Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,005,061
of 16,643,789 outputs
Outputs from International Sociology
#24
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,434
of 364,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Sociology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,643,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.