↓ Skip to main content

Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013114.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsiu-Ching Chiu, Louise Ada, Theofani A Bania

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 17 6%
Researcher 15 5%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 127 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 14%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 137 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,810,679
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,901
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,422
of 521,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.