RT @Sander_vdLinden: Today in @NatureNews with @d_spiegel & team we present “five rules for evidence communication” 1) Inform, not persuad…
RT @Sander_vdLinden: Today in @NatureNews with @d_spiegel & team we present “five rules for evidence communication” 1) Inform, not persuad…
Normas básicas para informar de #Ciencia, vía @nresearchnews. Evite la certeza injustificada, evite lenguaje "cientifista", sea didáctico y recuerde siempre que INFORMAR NO ES PERSUADIR. >https://t.co/Nj22pPz3Hv (eng)
Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/oGVLrbWNB3
@VPrasadMDMPH I found this article to be pretty good. https://t.co/LrkLWutf1h
Imagine experts didn’t try to persuade non-experts, but sought only to inform them & present uncertainties about what’s known. Would that be better than experts trying to sway non-experts’ opinions by any means necessary? Excellent piece from @Nature h
@derekjsloan @devisridhar I sometimes think accusations of scaremongering are just projecting one's own emotional response on the messenger. Nothing is to be feared, only understood, a famous scientist said. I hope she was right. https://t.co/BfqIOmmODg
@JuliaLMarcus @mugecevik @zeynep @hankgreen Five rules for evidence communication Avoid unwarranted certainty, neat narratives and partisan presentation; strive to inform, not persuade. https://t.co/qcmRwjsORH
@spreeksteen Hier gaat “Peter weet t Beter” de fout in — uitgangspunt van wetenschapscommunicatie: inform don’t persuade. Weliswaar impliciet, maar toch ... https://t.co/BSYdgEKgkv https://t.co/j6N1txRNYu
RT @Sander_vdLinden: Today in @NatureNews with @d_spiegel & team we present “five rules for evidence communication” 1) Inform, not persuad…
@kakape @ngranati @EvolveDotZoo @arambaut @profvrr @nytimes You've probably seen this. How scientists can say 'we don't know'. https://t.co/BfqIOmmODg
RT @acmedsci: We love this piece on on evidence communication from @d_spiegel @MarteauTM @Sander_vdLinden @alex_freeman 📌 You can also cat…
We love this piece on on evidence communication from @d_spiegel @MarteauTM @Sander_vdLinden @alex_freeman 📌 You can also catch up with our previous work on how we can best use evidence at https://t.co/lKbmdQamRY https://t.co/rLOkxEw4Lq
RT @Ayjchan: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is…
RT @lovethebacchus: @Karl_Lauterbach Interessanter Nature Artikel wie man wissenschaftlichen Diskurs vereinfacht. Five rules for evidence c…
@c_drosten Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/0mMq57DaMH
@Karl_Lauterbach Interessanter Nature Artikel wie man wissenschaftlichen Diskurs vereinfacht. Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/0mMq57DaMH
RT @Ayjchan: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is…
RT @Ayjchan: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is…
Agree. This honesty is vital to maintain trust, especially if the unknown may carry an unfavorable outcome.
RT @Ayjchan: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is…
RT @Ayjchan: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is…
RT @Ayjchan: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is…
"Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." "Part of telling the whole story is talking about what we don’t know." "When you don’t know, say so; say what you are going to do to find out, and by when." https:
@PAlanMcMahon @Tammy61743035 @PoliticsGordon @kevverage @taf0650 Tammy and Kevin are a bit like a Steve somebody I had to block. He thought being on transmit only was communication. No-one likes a stuck record. I hope they will take a look at this charmin
RT @kazuigarashi: コロナ禍のような状況で大事になること:説得ではなく伝達、重要なprosとconsは併記してバイアス避ける、わからないことuncertaintyも明記する、証拠の「質」も説明する、偽情報への警戒を促す、とあります。 https://t.co/U…
コロナ禍のような状況で大事になること:説得ではなく伝達、重要なprosとconsは併記してバイアス避ける、わからないことuncertaintyも明記する、証拠の「質」も説明する、偽情報への警戒を促す、とあります。 https://t.co/UA5JzwXOZt
Five rules for evidence communications! We have to practice daily!
Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/09IVT5Tstf
For many, COVID-19 created the opportunity to grow skills & flex new muscles. For the scientific community, these skills include clearly & concisely communicating scientific findings, reducing the spread of false information. @nature shares some ti
RT @Merck_lifesci: For many, COVID-19 created the opportunity to grow skills & flex new muscles. For the scientific community, these skills…
For many, COVID-19 created the opportunity to grow skills & flex new muscles. For the scientific community, these skills include clearly & concisely communicating scientific findings, reducing the spread of false information. @nature shares some ti
With the explosion of #FakeNews, readers have become more weary and critical of the information they consume. In“Five Rules for Evidence Communication”, @nature outlines 5 ways researchers (& #SciComm-ers) can gain reader trust. https://t.co/Jh8ioGTNl
"The media might urge us to aim for memorable sound bites or go beyond the strength of the data: be honest and aware of such traps." > Great article on "evidence communication" in the times of fake news https://t.co/cLuU8ml1P4
RT @StPapagianneas: Five rules for evidence #communication - Avoid unwarranted certainty, neat narratives and partisan presentation; strive…
Five rules for evidence #communication - Avoid unwarranted certainty, neat narratives and partisan presentation; strive to inform, not persuade. https://t.co/JY5QJu2KDf #science #communications https://t.co/IuyBbLUvGp
RT @TimandraHarknes: "To Inform, Not Persuade" This, by @d_spiegel et al, is so very good on how to communicate evidence to the public: htt…
Samstagmorgen: Warum es gut ist, dass wir nicht (nur) nudgen @dlfkultur @jana_klaro @u1w1e Sources: https://t.co/ygbtqa0gzJ? https://t.co/4uKpbciEvl
Inform, don’t persuade. One of the best texts I have read about good (humble, humble, effective) evidence communication. 👏 https://t.co/bRcBXnQOmm)
Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/BqXzT3Zq7f https://t.co/UEdaLNvmHR
Politics aside, one key finding is that the burden of trust falls more on science/med rather than govt. This means doctors and scientists need to think hard about communicating in ways that exhibit trustworthiness. See: https://t.co/k3uaPRmMSy 5/x
RT @gorka_orive: Consejos para la comunicación o divulgación científica: - Informar, no persuadir. - Ofrecer equilibrio, no falso equilib…
RT @Sander_vdLinden: Today in @NatureNews with @d_spiegel & team we present “five rules for evidence communication” 1) Inform, not persuad…
RT @john_bailer: Upcoming @statsandstories episodes will feature conversations with colleagues working on risk and evidence communication i…
RT @john_bailer: Upcoming @statsandstories episodes will feature conversations with colleagues working on risk and evidence communication i…
Upcoming @statsandstories episodes will feature conversations with colleagues working on risk and evidence communication including one of the authors of this article, @alex_freeman. Other episodes will feature other risk communication researchers including
RT @ASA_SciPol: "So how do we demonstrate good intentions? We have to be open about our motivations, conflicts & limitations. Scientists wh…
RT @susan_bewley: The public hungry for trustworthy information (inc uncertainty). How to do it well looks very like @NICEComms CG138 @d_s…
RT @ASA_SciPol: "So how do we demonstrate good intentions? We have to be open about our motivations, conflicts & limitations. Scientists wh…
"So how do we demonstrate good intentions? We have to be open about our motivations, conflicts & limitations. Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." @d_spiegel & collaborators posit "evidence commun
RT @VariabilityBlog: https://t.co/HMlnFvdmme So basically, how I would like to be informed is how most people prefer to be informed on real…
Here is some excellent advice that can be applied to any complex conversation. "Say what you know; what you don’t know; what you are doing to find out; what people can do in the meantime to be on the safe side; and that advice will change." https://t.co/wg
RT @alex_freeman: We’ve got a comment in Nature today on why science needs good ‘evidence communication’ and not the typical rules of rheto…
Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/T1kgVQb3jx
👇
#32/260 Nature Comment: Five rules for evidence communication A fitting read for the night before a proposal is due 🙃 https://t.co/vH2A5OSGBa
RT @PositiveMaren: Important #comment with regard to #infodemic and challenge of #communication between #science and #journalism "media mig…
“Avoid unwarranted certainty, neat narratives and partisan presentation; strive to inform, not persuade.” The tricky balance of #scicomm well put in this article. @NatureNews https://t.co/wcXkY3SOO9
How to avoid becoming the - Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/5XWoxwKWbB
Five rules for evidence communication: • Inform, not persuade • Offer balance, not false balance • Disclose uncertainties • State evidence quality • Inoculate against misinformation #sciencecommunication https://t.co/5dUfWZ11ce
RT @Sander_vdLinden: Today in @NatureNews with @d_spiegel & team we present “five rules for evidence communication” 1) Inform, not persuad…
RT @agpatriota: Boas regras de comunicação: - Informe, não tente persuadir - Apresente o lado positivo e o negativo - Revele as incertezas…
RT @AGU_SciComm: Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/EGqnhDQwn8 #SciComm https://t.co/to2G7T3MlH
RT @AGU_SciComm: Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/EGqnhDQwn8 #SciComm https://t.co/to2G7T3MlH
Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/EGqnhDQwn8 #SciComm https://t.co/to2G7T3MlH
RT @sabinvaccine: Providing the public with accurate & trustworthy information is critical for effective decision-making. Researchers from…
The public hungry for trustworthy information (inc uncertainty). How to do it well looks very like @NICEComms CG138 @d_spiegel @HealthWatchUK https://t.co/3zVqY5R39Y
Most researchers have heard such exhortations many times, and for good reason. Such rhetorical devices often help to land the message, whether that message is designed to sell a product or win a grant. These are the traditional techniques of communicatio…
RT @bornk: Bookmarking this excellent & practical paper in @NatureNews: 5 rules for evidence communication in COVID19 era: 1-inform, don't…
RT @sabinvaccine: Providing the public with accurate & trustworthy information is critical for effective decision-making. Researchers from…
RT @sabinvaccine: Providing the public with accurate & trustworthy information is critical for effective decision-making. Researchers from…
Providing the public with accurate & trustworthy information is critical for effective decision-making. Researchers from the University of Cambridge recommend 5 key strategies for effective evidence communication: https://t.co/Bo01zxilis
RT @Sander_vdLinden: Today in @NatureNews with @d_spiegel & team we present “five rules for evidence communication” 1) Inform, not persuad…
RT @AGU_SciComm: Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/EGqnhDQwn8 #SciComm https://t.co/ZVqSBBl6P0
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
RT @CitizenSciences: Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/ZXy6u01LQJ
RT @AGU_SciComm: Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/EGqnhDQwn8 #SciComm https://t.co/ZVqSBBl6P0
Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/EGqnhDQwn8 #SciComm https://t.co/ZVqSBBl6P0
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
RT @TranspariMED: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." https://t.co/K2tJigoZdA @HansG…
RT @NatureNews: Always aiming to ‘sell the science’ doesn’t help the scientific process or the scientific community in the long run. https:…
'Our aim is to design communications that do not lead people to a particular decision, but help them to understand what is known about a topic and to make up their own minds on the basis of that evidence' - who could argue with that? https://t.co/PSud9gkEy
RT @NutrirAColombia: Estas reglas tienen una gran relevancia en nutrición. Five rules for evidence communication https://t.co/IPeel2PDgz…
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
‘Conventional communication techniques might ‘work’ when the aim is to change people’s beliefs or behaviours. But should that always be our aim?’ Excellent read for anybody in the #communication field #C4D #communication4change
@Students4BE share an article on effectively communicating information - applies to literature review and synthesis. #uaconwritecoach #uacongradwrite #uaznursing
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
RT @nogracias_eu: "Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidista…
"Cinco reglas para la comunicación de pruebas científicas. Evite la certeza injustificada y las presentaciones partidistas. Esforzarse por informar, no por persuadir". Viene al pelo para estos tiempos que corren 😉
Excellent set of guidelines.
RT @ScienceShared: Wholeheartedly agree. Respectful communication, such as the excellent MHRA/JVCI briefing today, is what is needed, not…
". . .the literature. . .identifies expertise, honesty & good intentions as the key to trustworthiness. . .Researchers need to demonstrate all three: we cannot expect to be trusted on the basis of expertise alone." #scicom, w/lots of tips & resear
RT @TranspariMED: @VPrasadMDMPH "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." https://t.co/K2tJ…
RT @TranspariMED: "Scientists whose objectives are perceived as prioritizing persuasion risk losing trust." https://t.co/K2tJigoZdA @HansG…
There must be some mistake in this article. It says 'disclose uncertainties'. That's in contrast with everything I read
RT @ScienceShared: Wholeheartedly agree. Respectful communication, such as the excellent MHRA/JVCI briefing today, is what is needed, not…