RT @samerbagaeen: @DHSCgovuk the rate of asymptomatic infections - a meta-analysis October 2020, which included 13 studies involving 21,708…
@DHSCgovuk the rate of asymptomatic infections - a meta-analysis October 2020, which included 13 studies involving 21,708 people, calculated rate of asymptomatic presentation was 17%. asymptomatic people seem to clear virus faster & are infectious for
Given today’s news about 350,000 deaths in the US due to Covid, here’s a good thread on what we know about asymptomatic infections.
@John37866 @mickytrublu @MrTomPurcell @bhinvest2 @GarySidley The risk is one quarter that of a presymptomatic person this increases where people have a high chance of passing on droplets in a confined space like a classroom - where students were advised no
@AndyWinterBN1 @doctor_oxford Andy, question for @NHSuk is what burden vaccination put on clinical staff - decisions taken by managers of course. if you got symptoms you’re at home. rate of asymptomatic presentation around 17% & asymptomatic individual
@shinybeast_ @cornerhubble @JDatchens @_Its_Me_Cora_ @KirstieMAllsopp Here’s one from Nature then. Still doesn’t seem to be any consensus on the impact, of otherwise, of asymptomatic infection. https://t.co/C0oyv8GjJf
@TheMoz10 @Katheri97471567 @AllysonPollock @GailSouthern3 @BBCNews People without symptoms can pass on the virus, but estimating their contribution is the issue Until we know for sure the extent that asymptomatic people spread COVID we have to assume they
@HypnosVl @ValentinoPerru2 Tu veux une étude peut-être ? Lol j'avais fait l'effort de vous prendre un truc en français pour que vous compreniez Mais bon https://t.co/76MZisOXRO
@GiotaPim @v_margar there are over 80 studies on asymptomatic transmission i just posted the one with the most participants, if your goal is knowledge do some research. here is a great article to start from. good day https://t.co/LcQRvGucJA
@cheeseynutkins @doctor_oxford @ClarkeMicah @mjlambert https://t.co/xo6MGb8KFr Yes: asymptomatic people are less infectious than symptomatic people but more likely to come into contact with others. It IS a problem.
@AnnieandMaisie For children read age 12 - 16 years, which is what was actually said. Also, if they are asymptomatic (as opposed to presymptomatic) they are much less likely to transmit the infection. https://t.co/M6akd3zFXV
@slemar_ @magicmiz @ClarkeMicah @Quaintpondering Yes there is. Oh, HI does not work without a vaccine and tell me how you shield 25% of UK pop? You can't, it is mupperty as the expert reaction points out. https://t.co/GFqzQfYcTu
@shepcharl There is little scientific evidence for asymptomatic spread. Studies suggest that fewer than 1/5 infections are asymptomatic (as opposed to presymptomatic) and asymptomatic individuals are much less likely transmit infection. https://t.co/M6akd3
Interesting article (for virus geeks) explaining what we know about asymtematic and presymptematic transmission of the the virus that causes #COVID19 https://t.co/piknVgoFME
@triathlete06 @yneb_on @Strangis2020 Muppet. How many dead people do you want? Oh, hang on, there is that inane and gormless grin https://t.co/GFqzQfYcTu
@AdeleBull4 And this https://t.co/SlyrgtoBpb
@Chti_Insoumis @isAshPsy https://t.co/ZOAvE1727v Lisez la revue scientifique Nature alors. Moins "putaclic", mais intéressant.
What the data say about asymptomatic COVID infections https://t.co/rEEvACOHL5
@nunyobidnaz @RachelNotley Sorry, what was that? 🤔 https://t.co/lT1OJCJZso
@TeamBaDJane @taneagrafika @rupert_pearse Fucking hell Jane! Stop talking bollocks! The misinformation you are spreading is putting others ar risk! https://t.co/UvqIcqo4jU
@DrSarcasmo89 @drFabianR @RojasGuss @doctormosqueda calida no es igual a cantidad, sí me explico?..https://t.co/BxTH07Kzyo así de mediocres son los estudios que aseveran que los asintomáticos contagian.. y tu analogía no aplica para este topico
@rotewolle Gründe dafür könnten eben eine kürzere infektiöse Phase und weniger Kontamination/Transmission durch z.B. Husten und Niesen sein. 2/2 https://t.co/AIuUkg28nL
RT @elaval: @edalgomezn Al parecer es un tema que aún requiere mucha más investigación https://t.co/WTK1lNzOqn
@edalgomezn Al parecer es un tema que aún requiere mucha más investigación https://t.co/WTK1lNzOqn
@SonyaSmith @bloodycrown1319 @kylekusiowski1 @BrendaLeeNY @realDonaldTrump The jury is still out on this. https://t.co/X4Cc9oEnco
@UH60Andy @Dukeofwuckfit @GOVUK Here an article I found helpful on this. Clear that a lot is still being discovered about COVID, but there are also some things that are already clear. https://t.co/9RdFCuu4M3
No, one study said it was 42% less likely. https://t.co/bazynIcqr2
@torytothecore @Paula_H25 @LozzaFox @bbc5live I said mildly symptomatic? R0 Flu: 1.2-15 C19: had 3-5, variant 5-8 So spreads far easier. Infectivity's a sliding scale, but those ill enough to stay home implicitly isolate. It's those less ill that are th
@TomiLahren .@TwitterSafety why are you sitting on your hands .@jack ????
And here's what we do know about COVID-19: 1. The mRNA vaccines are extremely effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections. 2. Individuals with asymptomatic COVID-19 infections are FAR less contagious than those with contagious infections http
Commonsense asymptomatic less likely to spread covid and any virus. https://t.co/SMYyiPGN8K
RT @MarkoMark13: @CJforeveryoung @ChrisKearney3 @toekneeheart @timspector You are wrong. Please do some research before tweeting disinforma…
@_Bakhtali @esther241101 @mkeulemans @volkskrant Maar het blijven schattingen. https://t.co/spNUrMecq6
@HagleyTom1234 @Corbieres999 @Lord__G @SkyNews https://t.co/xxet6EzZyr Tom this is a useful link for you. It's not political just stating facts in an easy read. Please think about your actions. Handling of the virus and economic consequences go hand in han
@SassyCoopster @SeanCollins66 that’s not true https://t.co/FGKySvKX6F
@raptor597dpj @ryanbrees @MikeTriplett asymptomatic people are also somewhere between 15% and 20% of all cases - and people can also test positive before they show any symptoms (usually in 7 to 13 days) https://t.co/btGYHxIceY.
@KeatonPatterso1 @goodfortuneamy @DamarisFany Ese es apenas un estudio. Hay otros que indican que los asintomáticos sí contagian y, sobre todo, también los presintomáticos. Está publicada una revisión de literatura en la misma revista Nature: https://t.co/
RT @DaddoLanglois: @AEClarke_Books @littlecitysteve @BurnsideNotTosh @s8mb @allisonpearson Current theories asymptomatic patients don’t spr…
@bat0ulsall0um @karim_nemr1 بعد ما في دليل علمي على انو اللي بدون عوارض عم يعدي و عم بيأثر عالpandemic. https://t.co/JUnX2NjBhN
RT @nataliexdean: I see a growing body of evidence that individuals who *never* develop symptoms are less infectious. This has practical im…
RT @nataliexdean: I see a growing body of evidence that individuals who *never* develop symptoms are less infectious. This has practical im…
@charles91423970 No. NATURE is one of the two most prestigious science journals in the world. Here’s what they say, bottom line: 1. You CAN transmit it even if you don’t have symptoms. 2. They’re NOT SURE how prevalent that it. It’s really hard to measure!
@MaxiKoenig @GrlMba @FrauT18 @PrienKarin Naja, der Beitrag Asymptomatischer wird größtenteils schon eher als gering angesehen, auch die Studienlage sieht eher keine "secret drivers" der Pandemie durch Asymptomatische. https://t.co/0K2QMDVNRF
@smit88_ @JuliaHB1 @Ackersboy @allisonpearson @s8mb https://t.co/4ZbJonLcu2 Unfortunately the jury is out on this. “The actual public-health burden of this massive pool of interacting ‘asymptomatics’ in the community probably suggests that a sizeable port
@Ruben_DeHerdt @torfsrik "But researchers are divided about whether asymptomatic infections are acting as a ‘silent driver’." Bron: https://t.co/TMCcdb8oGX 2/2
@billy_wells @EstherWeston2 @stewartdantec An article with scientific papers as references to disprove what you just said. https://t.co/MLi58MbMtu
Point #1 is flat out false. Just because we can’t accurately measure something doesn’t mean it isn’t there. https://t.co/7iLKFNduZ9
@MattLaslo @RandPaul He can't spread if he can't get it. Asymptomatic spread is rare (or nearly non-existent.) a) https://t.co/ohomOCHs5K B) https://t.co/3AMsxVcoGJ
@ShaliniVarma11 @rosielillie7 @welshgingirl @SeanCollins66 Wrong on both counts https://t.co/GFqzQfYcTu
@welshgingirl @rosielillie7 @SeanCollins66 Try this one. https://t.co/GFqzQfYcTu
@Cvukwriter @TonyGoldSE @Samfr Found it, thanks - statement on 30 Nov. This is good on asymptomatic infectiousness https://t.co/Pl2qIhAxlz Headline figure there is 1 in 5. Perhaps they got to 1 in 3 by combining a- and pre-symptomatic? Overstatement th
@BoLagerkvist @numbers97413 @janlotvall @vetcov19 Ytterligare steg: vi har kunnat veta länge att viruset smittar innan man känner sig sjuk, vilket FHM inte medgav, trots ihärdiga frågor på TV. Varför är det viktigt? För att kunna bete sig rätt, för att för
RT @mdaltinisik: Bu noktada, vakaları artık asemptomatik-semptomatik diye ikiye değil, asemptomatik, pre-semptomatik, semptomatik diye üçe…
@Marta00402789 @BreesAnna Nature published a review of the most up to date data and these researchers certainly didn’t conclude it was a lie: https://t.co/2XtU9qnbCo
RT @pueteen: 以下によると、無症状でも症状がある人の40%くらいの感染力はあるようです。陽性になるという条件も書いてませんので、既にデータとしては出ていたようですね。 国がこれを伝えない理由が不明です。 利権? What the data say about a…
@gmpolice According to https://t.co/DKdk6Ork91 it's 17% asymptomatic, and they have only 42% the rate of infecting others, so not 1 in 3 and not 100% chance of infecting others as we are being told by our gov. https://t.co/7h6BomUopm
@gooddadmike @pamturbo @RexChapman Yes it does. I didn’t say your article does, I said your source does. https://t.co/Li1MlVQEXr
A symptoms Pre symptoms A, terinfeksi tp tak bergejala P, terinfeksi tp gejala ringan yg bs berkembang ke berat. A di tes, negatif P, bisa positif Yg tpenting JANGAN mnambah iter virus (jumlh virus). Krn A, bs jd P. P bisa jadi bergejala berat. 3
@azza_1332 @whocares1311 @yinonw @DavideDionisi2 @Covid19DataUK *One* paper. The meta-analyses say different. https://t.co/vROnMRXpwx.
'The issue with putting a reliable figure on the rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 is distinguishing between people who are asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic, says Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious-disease researcher.' https://t.co/o9xPQTDhob
@FaheemYounus @jstrange1925 'The issue with putting a reliable figure on the rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 is distinguishing between people who are asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic, says Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious-disease researcher.' https://t.co/o9
@VivekPrabhudes2 @FaheemYounus @deepak30000 'The issue with putting a reliable figure on the rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 is distinguishing between people who are asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic, says Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious-disease researcher.'
RT @Glaven1994: Here's some actual information on asymptomatic people. The evidence suggests they are not a majority and they are less like…
@DeannaLVincent @Stang_Guy71 @mchooyah Not even close. WHO first downplayed asymptomatic spread in June and recent studies back it up. https://t.co/5g43LC0MP3
@wizum @whocares1311 @yinonw @DavideDionisi2 @Covid19DataUK It depends on whether you count "pre-symptomatic" in the figures or not. Data suggests "asymptomatic" spread is relatively low, but "presymptomatic" spread is higher. Either way, it's spread fro
@StephScolaro I saw you post about your father a doctor, sorry for your loss. I know you did not go to med school, but I did, and the information above is wrong. Here is the science -https://t.co/u1DD6MUfTC. Here is the non-medical explanation - https://t.
@ScotlandPhotos @EricTopol Not true. Doesn’t make sense logically, and the data also show that only 17% of spread is through asymptomatic hosts (83% through symptomatics) https://t.co/N6NnkyOQit
RT @pueteen: 以下によると、無症状でも症状がある人の40%くらいの感染力はあるようです。陽性になるという条件も書いてませんので、既にデータとしては出ていたようですね。 国がこれを伝えない理由が不明です。 利権? What the data say about a…
RT @pueteen: 以下によると、無症状でも症状がある人の40%くらいの感染力はあるようです。陽性になるという条件も書いてませんので、既にデータとしては出ていたようですね。 国がこれを伝えない理由が不明です。 利権? What the data say about a…
RT @nataliexdean: I see a growing body of evidence that individuals who *never* develop symptoms are less infectious. This has practical im…
@allenbaylus @EvadLOL @PaulFitz7 @ComalRising @jordylancaster @JackPosobiec Ever hear of Google? WHO first suggested it back in June, recent studies have backed it up. https://t.co/5g43LC0MP3
Asymptomatic transmission has *always* been extremely rare to the point that it's virtually non-existent. Which is consistent with everything we know about respiratory viral infections. We can't let "but it could!" dictate our public health strategies.
@JohnHewlin There is asymptotic spread https://t.co/bvGEPm0ARm
RT @nataliexdean: I see a growing body of evidence that individuals who *never* develop symptoms are less infectious. This has practical im…
RT @nataliexdean: I see a growing body of evidence that individuals who *never* develop symptoms are less infectious. This has practical im…
RT @pueteen: 以下によると、無症状でも症状がある人の40%くらいの感染力はあるようです。陽性になるという条件も書いてませんので、既にデータとしては出ていたようですね。 国がこれを伝えない理由が不明です。 利権? What the data say about a…
@crumbsnatcher40 @KbfPaul @lyne_ian Here's a study that almost agrees, but make the point more clear https://t.co/KGQCF1LQ1r Asymptomatics spread the disease less than symptomatics, because of course. 1.) They don't cough and sneeze etc, and also their v