↓ Skip to main content

Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1168 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions
Title
Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection
Published in
medRxiv, November 2020
DOI 10.1101/2020.11.18.20234369
Authors

Lumley, Sheila F, O’Donnell, Denise, Stoesser, Nicole E, Matthews, Philippa C, Howarth, Alison, Hatch, Stephanie B, Marsden, Brian D, Cox, Stuart, James, Tim, Warren, Fiona, Peck, Liam J, Ritter, Thomas G, de Toledo, Zoe, Warren, Laura, Axten, David, Cornall, Richard J, Jones, E Yvonne, Stuart, David I, Screaton, Gavin, Ebner, Daniel, Hoosdally, Sarah, Chand, Meera, Crook, Derrick W, O’Donnell, Anne-Marie, Conlon, Christopher P, Pouwels, Koen B, Walker, A Sarah, Peto, Tim EA, Hopkins, Susan, Walker, Timothy M, Jeffery, Katie, Eyre, David W, Sheila F Lumley, Denise O'Donnell, Nicole E Stoesser, Philippa C Matthews, Alison Howarth, Stephanie B Hatch, Brian D Marsden, Stuart Cox, Tim James, Fiona Warren, Liam J Peck, Thomas G Ritter, Zoe de Toledo, Laura Warren, David Axten, Richard J Cornall, E Yvonne Jones, David I Stuart, Gavin Screaton, Daniel Ebner, Sarah Hoosdally, Meera Chand, Oxford University Hospitals Staff Testing Group, Derrick W Crook, Anne-Marie O'Donnell, Christopher P Conlon, Koen B Pouwels, A Sarah Walker, Tim EA Peto, Susan Hopkins, Tim M Walker, Katie Jeffery, David W Eyre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,168 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1306. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,393
of 16,651,954 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#126
of 15,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#391
of 369,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#15
of 2,234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,651,954 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.