↓ Skip to main content

The power of social connection and support in improving health: lessons from social support interventions with childbearing women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The power of social connection and support in improving health: lessons from social support interventions with childbearing women
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s5-s4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhonda Small, Angela J Taft, Stephanie J Brown

Abstract

Social support interventions have a somewhat chequered history. Despite evidence that social connection is associated with good health, efforts to implement interventions designed to increase social support have produced mixed results. The aim of this paper is to reflect on the relationship between social connectedness and good health, by examining social support interventions with mothers of young children and analysing how support was conceptualised, enacted and valued, in order to advance what we know about providing support to improve health. CONTEXT AND APPROACH: First, we provide a brief recent history of social support interventions for mothers with young children and we critically examine what was intended by 'social support', who provided it and for which groups of mothers, how support was enacted and what was valued by women. Second, we examine the challenges and promise of lay social support approaches focused explicitly on companionship, and draw on experiences in two cluster randomised trials which aimed to improve the wellbeing of mothers. One trial involved a universal approach, providing befriending opportunities for all mothers in the first year after birth, and the other a targeted approach offering support from a 'mentor mother' to childbearing women experiencing intimate partner violence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 16%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 69 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 48 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 15%
Psychology 35 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 77 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,763,817
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,561
of 17,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,563
of 246,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.