↓ Skip to main content

主観確率を含んだ累積プロスペクト理論モデルの推定精度について

Overview of attention for article published in Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 112)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
主観確率を含んだ累積プロスペクト理論モデルの推定精度について
Published in
Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), January 2019
DOI 10.2333/jbhmk.46.53
Authors

藤田 和也, 岡田 謙介

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,692,648
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
#11
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,459
of 448,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.