You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
観血的および非観血的に治療した椎茸による食餌性イレウスの2例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.11231/jaem.37.1039 |
| Authors |
永岡 智之, 石田 直樹, 中川 祐輔, 梶原 伸介 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 15 | 23% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#922,013
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#5
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,233
of 349,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them