You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pan-Canadian prospective study of young women with breast cancer: the rationale and protocol design for the RUBY study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Oncology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3747/co.27.6751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.L. Quan, I.A. Olivotto, N.N. Baxter, C.M. Friedenreich, K. Metcalfe, E. Warner, K. MacLennan, J.E. Stephen, M. Akbari, D. Howell, S. Narod, Jay Engel, Louise Provencher, Ari Meguerditchian, Kelly Dabbs, Mylene Ward, Lucy Helyer, Jean Francois Boileau, Nicole Hodgson, Gary Groot, Tony Gomes, Muriel Brackstone, Mai-Kim Gervais, Andre Robidoux, Bryan Wells, Christopher Cox, Nancy Down, David McCready, Rebecca Warburton, Banks Brie, Baliski Christopher, Rene Hanrahan, Ralph George, Frances Wright, Matthew Holmes, Marianna Kapala, Darren Biberdorf, Priya Chopra, Pamela Hebbard, Angel Arnaout, Tulin Cil, Poole Alex, Antoine Bouchard-Fortier, RUBY site investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,102,687
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Current Oncology
#978
of 2,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,662
of 432,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oncology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.