↓ Skip to main content

Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients

Overview of attention for article published in this source, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007557.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junqueira, Daniela RG, Perini, Edson, Penholati, Raphael RM, Carvalho, Maria G

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction presenting as a prothrombotic disorder related to antibody-mediated platelet activation. It is a poorly understood paradoxical immune reaction resulting in thrombin generation in vivo, which leads to a hypercoagulable state and the potential to initiate venous or arterial thrombosis. A number of factors are thought to influence the incidence of HIT including the type and preparation of heparin (unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) and the heparin-exposed patient population, with the postoperative patient population presenting a higher risk.Although LMWH has largely replaced UFH as a front-line therapy, there is evidence supporting a lack of superiority of LMWH compared with UFH regarding prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following surgery, and similar frequencies of bleeding have been described with LMWH and UFH. The decision as to which of these two preparations of heparin to use may thus be influenced by adverse reactions such as HIT. We therefore sought to determine the relative impact of UFH and LMWH specifically on HIT in postoperative patients receiving thromboembolism prophylaxis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 21%