↓ Skip to main content

Black cohosh (Cimicifuga spp.) for menopausal symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
406 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Black cohosh (<i>Cimicifuga</i> spp.) for menopausal symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007244.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Leach, Vivienne Moore

Abstract

Menopause can be a distressing and disruptive time for many women, with many experiencing hot flushes, night sweats, vaginal atrophy and dryness. Postmenopausal women are also at increased risk of osteoporosis. Interventions that decrease the severity and frequency of these menopausal symptoms are likely to improve a woman's well-being and quality of life. Hormone therapy has been shown to be effective in controlling the symptoms of menopause; however, many potentially serious adverse effects have been associated with this treatment. Evidence from experimental studies suggests that black cohosh may be a biologically plausible alternative treatment for menopause; even so, findings from studies investigating the clinical effectiveness of black cohosh have, to date, been inconsistent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 399 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 16%
Student > Master 48 12%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 138 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 5%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 146 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#256,382
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#421
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,213
of 188,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.