| Title |
Agricultural land-use change alters the structure and diversity of Amazon riparian forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108862 |
| Authors |
Leonardo Maracahipes-Santos, Divino V. Silvério, Marcia N. Macedo, Leandro Maracahipes, Kathi Jo Jankowski, Lucas N. Paolucci, Christopher Neill, Paulo M. Brando |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 33% |
| United States | 5 | 24% |
| Panama | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,534,623
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,284
of 6,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,968
of 522,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#37
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.