↓ Skip to main content

Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005014.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Kendrick, Ben Young, Amanda J Mason-Jones, Nohaid Ilyas, Felix A Achana, Nicola J Cooper, Stephanie J Hubbard, Alex J Sutton, Sherie Smith, Persephone Wynn, Caroline A Mulvaney, Michael C Watson, Carol Coupland

Abstract

In industrialised countries injuries (including burns, poisoning or drowning) are the leading cause of childhood death and steep social gradients exist in child injury mortality and morbidity. The majority of injuries in pre-school children occur at home but there is little meta-analytic evidence that child home safety interventions reduce injury rates or improve a range of safety practices, and little evidence on their effect by social group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 22%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 15%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Psychology 12 6%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 41 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#769,580
of 17,717,881 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,958
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,987
of 112,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,717,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.