↓ Skip to main content

Individualized versus standard diet fortification for growth and development in preterm infants receiving human milk

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individualized versus standard diet fortification for growth and development in preterm infants receiving human milk
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013465.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica Fabrizio, Jennifer M Trzaski, Elizabeth A Brownell, Patricia Esposito, Shabnam Lainwala, Mary M Lussier, James I Hagadorn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Unspecified 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,118,502
of 17,438,794 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,806
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,551
of 403,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,438,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.