You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the value of SCOTENS as a cross-border professional learning network in Ireland using the Wenger–Trayner value-creation framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oxford Review of Education, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/03054985.2020.1835624 |
| Authors |
Linda Clarke, Conor Galvin, Maria Campbell, Pamela Cowan, Kathy Hall, Geraldine Magennis, Teresa O’Doherty, Noel Purdy, Lesley Abbott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 12 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 84% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 29% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,204,587
of 24,579,850 outputs
Outputs from Oxford Review of Education
#53
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,049
of 519,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oxford Review of Education
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.