↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the value of SCOTENS as a cross-border professional learning network in Ireland using the Wenger–Trayner value-creation framework

Overview of attention for article published in Oxford Review of Education, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 581)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the value of SCOTENS as a cross-border professional learning network in Ireland using the Wenger–Trayner value-creation framework
Published in
Oxford Review of Education, November 2020
DOI 10.1080/03054985.2020.1835624
Authors

Linda Clarke, Conor Galvin, Maria Campbell, Pamela Cowan, Kathy Hall, Geraldine Magennis, Teresa O’Doherty, Noel Purdy, Lesley Abbott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 5 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,058,185
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Oxford Review of Education
#49
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,760
of 504,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oxford Review of Education
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.