↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 57,732)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19818-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy van Dorp, Damien Richard, Cedric C. S. Tan, Liam P. Shaw, Mislav Acman, François Balloux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,643 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 390 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Master 37 9%
Other 19 5%
Other 77 20%
Unknown 98 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 113 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3804. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,371
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18
of 57,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92
of 523,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#4
of 1,459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.