↓ Skip to main content

Efficient experimental design and analysis strategies for the detection of differential expression using RNA-Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
citeulike
17 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficient experimental design and analysis strategies for the detection of differential expression using RNA-Sequencing
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-484
Pubmed ID
Authors

José A Robles, Sumaira E Qureshi, Stuart J Stephen, Susan R Wilson, Conrad J Burden, Jennifer M Taylor

Abstract

RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has emerged as a powerful approach for the detection of differential gene expression with both high-throughput and high resolution capabilities possible depending upon the experimental design chosen. Multiplex experimental designs are now readily available, these can be utilised to increase the numbers of samples or replicates profiled at the cost of decreased sequencing depth generated per sample. These strategies impact on the power of the approach to accurately identify differential expression. This study presents a detailed analysis of the power to detect differential expression in a range of scenarios including simulated null and differential expression distributions with varying numbers of biological or technical replicates, sequencing depths and analysis methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
Germany 6 1%
Brazil 6 1%
France 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 534 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 180 30%
Researcher 159 27%
Student > Master 63 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Student > Postgraduate 25 4%
Other 78 13%
Unknown 55 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 329 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 108 18%
Computer Science 17 3%
Mathematics 15 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 2%
Other 46 8%
Unknown 69 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,415,303
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#287
of 10,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,874
of 171,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.