You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors influencing the implementation of fall-prevention programmes: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Child, Victoria Goodwin, Ruth Garside, Tracey Jones-Hughes, Kate Boddy, Ken Stein |
| Abstract |
More than a third of people over the age of 65 years fall each year. Falling can lead to a reduction in quality of life, mortality, and a risk of prolonged hospitalisation. Reducing and preventing falls has become an international health priority. To help understand why research evidence has often not been translated into changes in clinical practice, we undertook a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research in order to identify what factors serve as barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of fall-prevention programmes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 22% |
| Unknown | 61 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,028,696
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#667
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,611
of 168,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.