↓ Skip to main content

Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013639.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nayaar Islam, Jean-Paul Salameh, Mariska MG Leeflang, Lotty Hooft, Trevor A McGrath, Christian B van der Pol, Robert A Frank, Sakib Kazi, Ross Prager, Samanjit S Hare, Carole Dennie, René Spijker, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Kevin Jenniskens, Daniël A Korevaar, Jérémie F Cohen, Ann Van den Bruel, Yemisi Takwoingi, Janneke van de Wijgert, Junfeng Wang, Matthew DF McInnes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Researcher 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Computer Science 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 22 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#698,097
of 17,388,379 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,770
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,657
of 401,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,388,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.