↓ Skip to main content

Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013639.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nayaar Islam, Jean-Paul Salameh, Mariska MG Leeflang, Lotty Hooft, Trevor A McGrath, Christian B van der Pol, Robert A Frank, Sakib Kazi, Ross Prager, Samanjit S Hare, Carole Dennie, René Spijker, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Kevin Jenniskens, Daniël A Korevaar, Jérémie F Cohen, Ann Van den Bruel, Yemisi Takwoingi, Janneke van de Wijgert, Junfeng Wang, Matthew DF McInnes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 12 15%
Other 11 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Computer Science 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#716,700
of 17,833,983 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,780
of 11,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,344
of 414,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,833,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.