↓ Skip to main content

Population status, trends and a re-examination of the hypotheses explaining the recent declines of the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Review, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population status, trends and a re-examination of the hypotheses explaining the recent declines of the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina
Published in
Mammal Review, January 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00055.x
Authors

CLIVE R. MCMAHON, MARTHAN N. BESTER, HARRY R. BURTON, MARK A. HINDELL, COREY J. A. BRADSHAW

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 4%
United States 5 3%
South Africa 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 150 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 67%
Environmental Science 26 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 16 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2008.
All research outputs
#1,913,744
of 7,811,022 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Review
#90
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,478
of 257,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Review
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,811,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.