↓ Skip to main content

The acceptability of a depression screening tool in an urban, Aboriginal community-controlled health service

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The acceptability of a depression screening tool in an urban, Aboriginal community-controlled health service
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, June 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2007.00058.x
Authors

Danielle M. Esler, Fay Johnston, David Thomas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 32%
Unspecified 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Psychology 5 26%
Unspecified 3 16%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,306,330
of 11,719,214 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#506
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,417
of 267,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,719,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.