↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, August 2007
DOI 10.2193/2006-292
Authors

ROBERT A. LONG, THERESE M. DONOVAN, PAULA MACKAY, WILLIAM J. ZIELINSKI, JEFFREY S. BUZAS

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Brazil 11 2%
India 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 511 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 144 26%
Student > Master 112 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 7%
Other 37 7%
Other 78 14%
Unknown 59 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 321 58%
Environmental Science 122 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 1%
Computer Science 4 <1%
Other 20 4%
Unknown 72 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#677,512
of 12,231,187 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#85
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,405
of 266,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,231,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.